Commitment to Accuracy
Late Receipt is committed to accuracy, clarity, and accountability. The site exists to document public claims, institutional narratives, and the outcomes that follow them. Because this work depends on factual integrity, errors are taken seriously.
Every article is written with care, but mistakes can occur. When they do, they will be addressed transparently.
Corrections Policy
If a factual error is identified in a published article, Late Receipt will issue a correction. Corrections will clearly state what was changed and why, without obscuring the original context.
Minor edits for clarity, grammar, or formatting may be made without formal notice. Substantive factual corrections will be documented.
How Corrections Are Handled
- Corrections are added directly to the affected article when appropriate
- The correction will explain the nature of the error and the accurate information
- The goal is record integrity, not reputational management
Reader Submissions
Readers who believe an article contains a factual error may submit a correction request. Requests should be specific, factual, and supported by verifiable sources.
Once a contact mechanism is published, submissions will be reviewed and addressed when warranted.
Editorial Accountability
Late Receipt does not remove content solely because it is controversial or uncomfortable. Articles are evaluated based on accuracy, evidence, and relevance.
The purpose of corrections is not to revise history, but to preserve an accurate public record.